Aufgabe 2 - Teilaufgabe 3 · Abitur NRW Biologie GK · Haupttermin · bilingual Englisch 2022
Thema: Stammbäume, Verhalten und Evolution des Menschen · Aus der Prüfung GK · Haupttermin · bilingual Englisch (2022)
Aufgabenstellung
Material A: Ecology of Eurasian Shrews
The Eurasian water shrew 1 ( Neomys fodiens), the Mediterranean water shrew 2 ( Neomys anomalus) and the common shrew 3 ( Sorex araneus) all belong to the shrew family. All three species occur together in Europe and in parts of Asia.
The Eurasian water shrew is the largest of the three species. It has swimming bristles 4 on its hind feet and on its tail. It can swim and dive well. This nocturnal animal lives in thinner vegetation along the banks of fast-flowing rivers and streams. Swamps, wet forests and meadows are inhabited as well. The Mediterranean water shrew is also nocturnal and can also swim and dive. Its swimming bristles are shorter than those of the Eurasian water shrew and are sometimes missing entirely. It prefers to live on the banks of slower-flowing waters and in wetland areas with thick herb and bush growth. The diurnal and nocturnal common shrew occurs particularly in wet forests and meadows, but can also be found in other terrestrial habitats.
In addition to the invertebrates shown in Table 1, the Eurasian water shrew also preys upon smaller vertebrates such as frogs and fish. The common shrew occasionally eats small vertebrates such as frogs and young mice.
Table 1 Prey spectrum of the Eurasian water shrew, the Mediterranean water shrew and the common shrew. The faeces of captured shrews were analysed. The values show the percentage of shrews in which each prey animal type was found.
· Eurasian
water shrew · Mediterranean
water shrew · Common shrew
Terrestrial prey
Ground beetles · 22.6 % · 30.8 % · 6.3 %
Other beetles · 32.3 % · 38.5 % · 56.3 %
Beetle larvae · 6.5 % · 23.1 % · 31.3 %
Ants · 12.9 % · 0.0 % · 25.0 %
Millipedes · 61.3 % · 38.5 % · 3.1 %
Spiders · 74.2 % · 76.9 % · 63.3 %
Earthworms · 45.2 % · 100.0 % · 90.6 %
Aquatic prey
Caddisfly larvae 5 · 12.9 % · 15.4 %
Soldier fly larvae 6 · 6.5 % · 15.4 %
Asellus aquaticus 7 · 51.6 % · 23.1 %
1 Eurasische Wasserspitzmaus | 2 Sumpfspitzmaus | 3 Waldspitzmaus | 4 Schwimmborsten | 5 Köcherfliegenlarven | 6 Waffenfliegenlarven | 7 Wasserasseln
Material B: Prey Handling by Shrew Species
Shrews consume a large amount of food every day to meet their high energy requirements. As they are also active in the winter, they need food all year round. They often capture more prey than they consume directly; some of the prey animals are hoarded 8 for a while in their burrows 9. Some of these prey animals are bitten to immobilise them. This can be carried out mechanically by biting through nerves which innervate muscles. This immobilisation is also possible through the use of venoms.
The Eurasian water shrew and the Mediterranean water shrew produce a venom in glands under the tongue. The venom is transferred to the prey together with saliva and has a paralysing effect on the muscles. The common shrew, in contrast, is not venomous.
In a lab experiment, researchers investigated how the Eurasian water shrew and the smaller common shrew handle prey of different sizes and masses. The shrews were offered various prey animals: mealworms 10 were used as small, light prey, earthworms were used as medium-sized prey, and frogs as large, heavy prey. The proportions of the prey animals which were eaten either directly or little by little were determined, as were the proportions of prey animals which were either hoarded in the burrows or completely ignored (Figure 1A). Figure 1B shows the length of time needed to overpower the prey.
8 horten | 9 Bau | 10 Mehlkäferlarven
Material C: Relationships and Venomousness
The relationships between selected genera of shrew were determined based on molecular data; in a phylogenetic tree, these relationships are shown together with the occurrence of the trait 'venomousness' (Figure 2). The Eurasian water shrew and the Mediterranean water shrew both belong to the genus Neomys (Eurasian water shrews).
3. Analyse the phylogenetic tree shown in Figure 2 with regard to the presence of venom in the listed genera (Materials B and C). Drawing on all the materials, develop a hypothesis about how the Eurasian water shrew and the Mediterranean water shrew evolved (Materials A–C).
[20 Punkte]

Lösung
Nach den offiziellen Korrekturhinweisen
3. Analyse the phylogenetic tree shown in Figure 2 with regard to the presence of venom in the listed genera (Materials B and C). Drawing on all the materials, develop a hypothesis about how the Eurasian water shrew and the Mediterranean water shrew evolved (Materials A–C).
Lösung: Analyse of phylogenetic tree: - The last common ancestor of the represented genera lived approximately 65 million years ago. About 20 million years ago, the evolutionary lineage of shrews diverged. - Venomous species are found in genera that are not closely related (*Neomys*, *Blarina*, *Crocidura*). The species of the remaining genera are non-venomous. - Due to the large number of lineages without venomous species, the trait of venomousness most likely arose independently multiple times in shrew evolution (convergent evolution) rather than indicating a close phylogenetic relationship. - Similar selection pressures in their respective habitats (e.g., hoarding larger prey animals) likely promoted this convergent development. Hypothesis on the evolution of Eurasian and Mediterranean water shrews: - Both belong to the genus *Neomys*. Their common ancestral species was likely venomous, as all representatives of this genus possess this trait. - Mutations in an ancestral population led to the development of venom production in sublingual glands, conferring a selective advantage in prey capture. - The last common ancestor of both species was likely already adapted to aquatic prey capture via swimming bristles. - More pronounced swimming bristles on the hind feet and tail in ancestors of the modern Eurasian water shrew enabled foraging in fast-flowing waters, facilitating the colonization of new ecological niches/habitats. - Gradual spatial and reproductive isolation separated the gene pools, leading to independent evolutionary divergence and speciation.
Die ausführliche Erklärung Schritt für Schritt (mit KI) gibt es mit Premium. Premium
Löse sie direkt hier: automatische Korrektur, Hinweise und Lösung Schritt für Schritt.
‹ Aufgabe 2 - Teilaufgabe 2 · GK · Haupttermin · bilingual Englisch 2022 · Aufgabe HT 2 - 2: Stammbäume, Verhalten und Evolution des… · GK · Haupttermin · Weiterbildungskolleg 2022 ›
Mehr Aufgaben zu Stammbäume, Verhalten und Evolution des Menschen
- Aufgabe 1 - Teilaufgabe 3: Stammbäume, Verhalten… · GK · Nachtermin 2023
- Aufgabe 1 - Evolution und Stammbaum · GK · Nachtermin · Weiterbildungskolleg 2023
- Aufgabe 1 - Stammbäume, Verhalten und Evolution d… · LK · Nachtermin 2023
- Aufgabe 1 - Teilaufgabe 4: Evolution der Fallenty… · LK · Nachtermin · Weiterbildungskolleg 2023
- Aufgabe 2 - Teilaufgabe 2 · GK · Haupttermin · bilingual Englisch 2022
- Aufgabe HT 2 - 2: Stammbäume, Verhalten und Evolution des… · GK · Haupttermin · Weiterbildungskolleg 2022
- Aufgabe 2 - Stammbäume, Verhalten und Evolution d… · GK · Haupttermin · Weiterbildungskolleg 2022
- Aufgabe 3 - Stammbäume, Verhalten und Evolution d… · GK · Haupttermin · Weiterbildungskolleg 2022
- Aufgabe 2 - Teilaufgabe 3: Stammbäume, Verhalten… · GK · Nachtermin 2022
- Aufgabe 1 - Teilaufgabe 1: Evolution und Verhalten · LK · Haupttermin · Weiterbildungskolleg 2022