Aufgabe HT 1 - 3.1 · Abitur NRW Englisch GK · Haupttermin (2) 2023
Thema: Stellungnahme und Erörterung (Comment / Discuss / Assess) · Aus der Prüfung GK · Haupttermin (2) (2023)
Aufgabenstellung
Klausurteil A
Rachel May
The Audit
The story takes place in North America at some point in the near future.
“Dad! You’ve got to come. We got the Audit.” The boy’s normally high voice took on a
husky rasp as he pronounced the last words.
“An audit? You make it sound like a fatal illness,” Bill responded to his anxiety-prone son
with a practiced calmness, as David grabbed his hand and started pulling him towards the
5 house. “Relax, Davey. It’s not that big a deal. Our taxes are all in order.” […]
As soon as they entered the house, Bill felt David’s hand tighten and his shoulders stiffen.
Bill’s wife Laurie was standing at the computer in the family room, biting her lip, while
their daughter Jess looked on with an inscrutable expression.
“C’mon, everybody. It’s just an audit, right?” Bill tried the soothing tone again. “What’s
10 the big deal? We’re as likely to get taxes back as to owe them.”
“It’s not a tax audit, honey. It’s the new one.” Laurie’s voice had a touch of the same husky
terror he had heard from David.
“Yeah, Dad. You know, the GCA?” Jess added, with the practiced superiority of a 14-year-old.
“GCA?”
15 David’s voice rose to a squeak. “I heard they take your house and car and everything!”
Laurie came over to give David a hug while Bill sat down, bewildered, at the computer.
“Now I’m sure it’s not that bad. Let me take a look.” He was embarrassed to admit he hadn’t
heard of the GCA, when even his fifth-grader seemed to know all about it.
Big yellow letters on a dark blue screen spelled out GLOBAL CLIMATE AUDIT. Every effort
20 to surf away from the page resulted in the same message: “You have been selected for the
GCA. Internet service will be restored after you complete your climate footprint calculation.”
“You have to do it, Dad. It’s international law.” Jess said. […]
It didn’t give Bill much confidence as he stared at the Climate Footprint Calculator on the
screen. It was essentially a detailed inventory of their daily habits. The GCA already had a
25 surprising wealth of information about them: the amount of gas they bought each week for
the SUV, how many BTUs it took to heat and cool their six-bedroom house, how much hot
water they used, even what percentage of strawberries they bought came from Chile. At one
point he called his credit card company to complain that this outfit had hacked into his records.
“No worries, sir. That’s the GCA. They have treaty rights to that information. It will not be
30 used for any purpose other than calculating your carbon overdraft.”
Overdraft. That sounded ominous. Bill finished the online questionnaire. Shortly after he hit
SEND, a graphic appeared showing three round pictures of Earth and an additional wedge
with most of the Americas. The caption read:
“Your carbon footprint is 3.4 times the acceptable global mean. If everyone generated
35 your level of greenhouse gases, 3.4 planet Earths would be required to accommodate the
emissions. The terms of the Global Climate Accord require that you reduce your
footprint as follows…”
They were giving the family a year to get the number down below three, and two more years
to get it to one, on penalty of severe fines. Bill had two weeks to present the GCA with a
40 plan. […]
Bill didn’t think he could blithely hit “ACCEPT” the way he did whenever iTunes updated
its terms of service. This GCA was deep in his credit card data and might have the power to
hold him to it. He called Laurie’s sister, who was a lawyer.
“Sorry, Bill. The GCA is the real deal. The US and every other nation on Earth signed an
45 agreement this year to enforce its terms. I can’t believe you hadn’t heard about it. World
leaders have been trying to pass a global climate policy framework for decades, but the best
the cowards could do was shift the burden from governments onto individuals. People all
around the world are getting audited, and credit card companies and utilities are obligated
to furnish quantitative information about their consumption patterns.”
50 “Tell me about it. It’s as if they had informers everywhere—our gas tank, our fridge, probably
my underwear drawer. So you’re saying I should accept the terms?”
“I don’t think you have a choice. There’s some fine print you can read at the website that
may give you a way around their requirements, but they tried to make this treaty have teeth.”
So Bill went ahead and nervously clicked the fateful button. It was a relief to see his browser
55 pop up as if nothing had happened. Except that in one corner there hovered a blue box with
yellow letters, which periodically flashed a message, saying “You have 14 days remaining
to complete your climate action plan.”
Annotations
26 BTU – British Thermal Unit, used as a unit of energy in the US and Canada
34 mean – here: average
41 blithely – without any worries
41 iTunes – free software program developed by Apple which acts as a media player
53 to have teeth ( informal) – to be powerful and effective
3.1 Given the serious impact of the climate crisis, comment on the question of whether a state should have the right to regulate individual lifestyles in order to achieve greater sustainability.
(Evaluation: comment) [14 Punkte]

Lösung
Nach den offiziellen Korrekturhinweisen
3.1 Given the serious impact of the climate crisis, comment on the question of whether a state should have the right to regulate individual lifestyles in order to achieve greater sustainability.
Lösung: A well-structured comment discussing state intervention into individual lifestyles for sustainability should address: 1. Relevance and urgency of state intervention: - Reflection on current ecological crises (global warming, extreme weather events, loss of biodiversity) and their severe economic, social, and political repercussions. - The urgency of immediate action on individual, communal, and governmental levels, noting that purely voluntary measures have often failed to achieve climate targets. 2. Critical discussion of state interference in personal lifestyle: - Arguments in favor of regulation: - The state's duty of care (Fürsorgepflicht) to safeguard current and future generations' fundamental living conditions. - The ethical responsibility of each individual towards the common good and collective survival. - Effectiveness: binding rules (speed limits, plastic bans, carbon pricing) produce tangible reductions. - Arguments against regulation / limiting factors: - Fundamental civil liberties, individual autonomy, informational self-determination, and privacy rights. - Questions of social fairness: stringent flat regulations may disproportionately burden low-income households compared to affluent citizens. - Feasibility, danger of authoritarian surveillance overreach, and loss of public acceptance. 3. Conclusion: - A well-reasoned, nuanced conclusion balancing necessary state framework conditions (incentives, systemic reforms, infrastructure) against disproportionate intrusions into individual private lives.
Die ausführliche Erklärung Schritt für Schritt (mit KI) gibt es mit Premium. Premium
Löse sie direkt hier: automatische Korrektur, Hinweise und Lösung Schritt für Schritt.
‹ Aufgabe HT 2 - Task 3.1 · GK · Haupttermin · Weiterbildungskolleg 2023 · Aufgabe HT 2 - 3.1 · GK · Haupttermin (2) 2023 ›
Mehr Aufgaben zu Stellungnahme und Erörterung (Comment / Discuss / Assess)
- Aufgabe 3.2 · LK · Kern: It’s not all coffee shops and 2025
- Aufgabe HT 1 - Klausurteil A - 3.1 · GK · Haupttermin 2023
- Aufgabe HT 2 - Klausurteil A - 3.1 · GK · Haupttermin 2023
- Aufgabe HT 1 - Task 3.1 · GK · Haupttermin · Weiterbildungskolleg 2023
- Aufgabe HT 2 - Task 3.1 · GK · Haupttermin · Weiterbildungskolleg 2023
- Aufgabe HT 2 - 3.1 · GK · Haupttermin (2) 2023
- Aufgabe NT 1 - Task 3.1 · GK · Nachtermin · Weiterbildungskolleg 2023
- Aufgabe NT 2 - Task 3.1 · GK · Nachtermin · Weiterbildungskolleg 2023
- Aufgabe 3.1 · GK · Suggs: Remembering the Rev. Joseph 2023
- Aufgabe 3.1 · GK · Thorpe: Successful African-American 2023