Ejercicio Practice Case - Question 2 · Economia de L'empresa UPF 2011
Tema: Actius específics, quasi-rendes i integració vertical · Del examen Final Exam Business Economics - December 2011 (2011)
Enunciado
Sr. Pallerols, a 48-year-old corporate engineer, has developed in his free time an innovative, patented food product dubbed FRESQUIA with major commercial potential. He is evaluating four distinct options:
Option 1: Sell the patent outright.
Option 2: License production rights to interested manufacturers for a royalty of 1 cent per unit produced.
Option 3: Form a 50/50 joint venture with Nestlé. Sr. Pallerols contributes a temporary operating license for FRESQUIA; Nestlé expands an existing manufacturing plant. Management is handled entirely by Nestlé’s current executive team.
Option 4: Create an independent startup company with 4 investors who contribute 50% of the financial capital, while Sr. Pallerols contributes the remaining 50% plus a permanent assignment of the patent. The company will hire 100 workers, a professional CEO, and 5 industry managers.
12 Practice Case - Question 2 (10 points). Asset specificity and hold-up hazards
In which of the four proposed options would issues related to specific assets (hold-up / opportunism) arise? Explain why these issues emerge in those cases and why they do not occur in the other options.
a)
b)

Solución
Según los criterios oficiales de corrección
In which of the four proposed options would issues related to specific assets (hold-up / opportunism) arise?
Solución: Option 2 and Option 4
Explain why these issues emerge in those cases and why they do not occur in the other options.
Solución: Hold-up emerges in Option 2 because disclosure of specific know-how creates ex-post vulnerability to royalty renegotiation. In Option 4, the permanent commitment of the patent into specialized startup assets locks in value subject to investor or managerial opportunism. Conversely, Option 1 eliminates bilateral dependency upon sale, and Option 3 aligns interests via mutual hostage-taking and shared 50/50 JV governance.
La explicación paso a paso, hecha con IA, es Premium. Premium
Resuélvelo aquí mismo: corrección automática, pistas y solución paso a paso.
‹ Ejercicio Short Question 7 · 2011