Ejercicio Practice Case - Question 2 · Economia de L'empresa UPF 2011

Tema: Actius específics, quasi-rendes i integració vertical · Del examen Final Exam Business Economics - December 2011 (2011)

Enunciado

Sr. Pallerols, a 48-year-old corporate engineer, has developed in his free time an innovative, patented food product dubbed FRESQUIA with major commercial potential. He is evaluating four distinct options:

Option 1: Sell the patent outright.

Option 2: License production rights to interested manufacturers for a royalty of 1 cent per unit produced.

Option 3: Form a 50/50 joint venture with Nestlé. Sr. Pallerols contributes a temporary operating license for FRESQUIA; Nestlé expands an existing manufacturing plant. Management is handled entirely by Nestlé’s current executive team.

Option 4: Create an independent startup company with 4 investors who contribute 50% of the financial capital, while Sr. Pallerols contributes the remaining 50% plus a permanent assignment of the patent. The company will hire 100 workers, a professional CEO, and 5 industry managers.

12 Practice Case - Question 2 (10 points). Asset specificity and hold-up hazards

In which of the four proposed options would issues related to specific assets (hold-up / opportunism) arise? Explain why these issues emerge in those cases and why they do not occur in the other options.

a)

b)

Enunciado: Ejercicio Practice Case - Question 2 · Economia de L'empresa UPF 2011

Solución

Según los criterios oficiales de corrección

In which of the four proposed options would issues related to specific assets (hold-up / opportunism) arise?

Solución: Option 2 and Option 4

Explain why these issues emerge in those cases and why they do not occur in the other options.

Solución: Hold-up emerges in Option 2 because disclosure of specific know-how creates ex-post vulnerability to royalty renegotiation. In Option 4, the permanent commitment of the patent into specialized startup assets locks in value subject to investor or managerial opportunism. Conversely, Option 1 eliminates bilateral dependency upon sale, and Option 3 aligns interests via mutual hostage-taking and shared 50/50 JV governance.

La explicación paso a paso, hecha con IA, es Premium. Premium

Resuélvelo aquí mismo: corrección automática, pistas y solución paso a paso.

‹ Ejercicio Short Question 7 · 2011

Más ejercicios de Actius específics, quasi-rendes i integració vertical